Verona Murphy
Portrait: © Houses of the Oireachtas (Oireachtas (Open Data) PSI Licence) · source file
Independent · Wexford · serving since 2024-11-29
- Vote recorded in 0 of 401 divisions in the archive
- 5,161 debate contributions
- 1 parliamentary questions asked
Record timeline
- constituency Wexford 2024-11-29 to present
- party Independent 2024-11-29 to present
- office Ceann Comhairle 2024-12-18 to present
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Amendment No. 9 in the name of Deputy Alan Kelly has been ruled out of order.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I am just about to read the reason. I thank the Deputy. Amendment No. 9 would insert a new definition for "legal counselling", a term used later in the Bill. This definition would provide that such services would be provided to persons free of charge irrespective of a person's ability to secure legal services by their own means. Amendment No. 47 in the name of Deputy Kelly forms a composite propos…
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
The Deputy will accept, however, that the Bills Office must operate under Standing Orders.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I thank the Deputy.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
All Deputies are free to take their case to the Committee on Standing Orders and Dáil Reform, should a change be required.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I thank the Deputy.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
We move now to amendment No. 10 in the names of Deputies Gannon and Kelly. Amendments Nos. 10, 17, 20, 134, 135, 154, 192 and 206 are related and may be discussed together.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Amendment No. 11 is out of order.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
As discussed earlier, amendments Nos. 1 and 11 would both require that the Minister carry out reports and administrative matters and lay these reports before the Houses before the Act or provisions thereof can be commenced. It is a long-established precedent that the commencement of an Act cannot be made contingent on an administrative matter external to the Houses, and that is to say contingent o…
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Amendments Nos. 12, 137, 138, 140, 144, 155, 159, 167, 194, 197, 221 to 224, inclusive, 245 to 247, inclusive, 255, 263, 266, 267 and 269 are all related and will be discussed together.
International Protection Bill 2026: Committee Stage
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I thank the Deputy. That concludes the debate for this evening as the time limit of eight hours has been reached.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Only one amendment was tabled for Report Stage, by Deputies Ruth Coppinger, Richard Boyd Barrett, and Paul Murphy. That amendment has been ruled out of order on the grounds of non-relevance to the provisions of the Bill and it does not arise out of Committee Stage proceedings. Accordingly, there are no amendments on Report Stage.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
As there are no amendments tabled for Report Stage that are in order, we now proceed to Fifth Stage. I welcome the Minister to the House.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
On the question?
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Yes.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Does the Minister want to come back in? No. The question now is that the Bill-----
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
Thank you, Deputy Coppinger. Please resume your seat.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I cannot demand an answer. Thank you, Deputy.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
You are out of order even asking that question.
Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) (Amendment) Bill 2025: Report and Final Stages
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
You know that my role is to be impartial and chair the debate. Thank you, Deputy.
Quality in Public Procurement (Contract Preparation and Award Criteria) Bill 2021 [Seanad]: Second Stage (Resumed) [Private Members]
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I must now deal with a postponed division relating to Second Stage of the Quality in Public Procurement (Contract Preparation and Award Criteria) Bill 2021, taken on Thursday, 12 February 2026. On the question, "That the Bill be now read a Second Time", a division was claimed and in accordance with Standing Order 85(2), that division must be taken now.
Ban on Investment Funds Purchasing Family Homes: Motion (Resumed) [Private Members]
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I must now deal with a postponed division relating to the motion regarding ban on investment funds purchasing family homes. On Tuesday, 17 February 2026, on the question, "That the amendment to the motion be agreed to", a division was claimed and in accordance with Standing Order 85(2), that division must be taken now.
Work Life Balance (Right to Remote Work) Bill 2026: Second Stage (Resumed) [Private Members]
2026-02-18 ·
debate record
I must now deal with a postponed division relating to Second Stage of the Work Life Balance (Right to Remote Work) Bill 2026, taken on Wednesday, 18 February 2026. On the question, "That the Bill be now read a Second Time", a division was claimed and in accordance with Standing Order 85(2), that division must be taken now.
Leaders' Questions
2026-02-12 ·
debate record
Would Deputy Boyd Barrett allow the Tánaiste answer? He asked the question.
Leaders' Questions
2026-02-12 ·
debate record
Thank you, Tánaiste.