defective holsters - all of which put gardaí at risk.
Those speaking out are senior members of An Garda Síochána. They include Dr. Donal Corcoran, the person who was in charge of the Garda protected disclosures office; Ms Rose Sweeney, a case manager; and Detective Superintendent Brian O’Reilly … head of the Garda Technical Bureau. What is absolutely astonishing here is that the very person running the protected disclosures office, Dr. Corcoran, and another charged with managing protected disclosures cases, Ms Sweeney, were themselves forced to make a protected disclosure. The question is: why? They state they
Search the record
Every word spoken in the Dáil and every parliamentary question asked, matched on word forms as well as exact spelling, so "housing" also finds "houses".
Narrow it down: a TD or a date range
17 in debates · 0 in questions
In debates
Garda powers, including powers of arrest and detention. Since then, a number of significant Supreme Court decisions, most notably in the cases of Corcoran and Quirke, have identified deficiencies in the existing law governing search warrants, particularly in relation to electronic devices and privileged material. These judgments highlighted … protection of fundamental rights.
The Bill must also be understood in the context of wider legal developments. The Supreme Court decisions in Corcoran and Quirke, together with judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, including in Landeck, underscore the need for a transparent, rights-compliant
reason this legislation is being brought forward relates to the very significant decisions given by the Supreme Court in the case of Emmett Corcoran and indeed the Quirke decision as well. This legislation is providing protection to privilege. If we look at section 10 of the Criminal Justice … concerned about it is that, as anyone who reads objectively the judgments of Mr. Justice Collins and Mr. Justice Hogan in the Corcoran decision will know, there is a question mark over section 10. It needs to be amended rapidly because, in fairness to the case taken
determined view in respect of section 10, but stated that there were question marks regarding it. The question marks arose in the Corcoran and Quirke cases. The Corcoran case related to a situation where a journalist was the person upon whom a search warrant was sought, granted … legal professional privilege should be upheld. One of the changes to Garda powers that I intend to bring forward, in response to the Corcoran and Quirke decisions, is an amendment of section 10 to ensure that the entitlement to journalistic privilege and legal professional privilege can be asserted
line to expose the truth. They will speak for themselves on RTÉ this evening.
Earlier today, we heard the voices of Dr. Donal Corcoran and Detective Superintendent Brian O'Reilly, two of the whistleblowers, on "Morning Ireland". The detective superintendent said that those who came forward were silenced … badly whistleblowers were treated and about the entire reconfiguration of the protected disclosures unit in response to the allegations made. We heard Dr. Corcoran say this morning that the Garda is now in a worse position than it was in the time of Maurice McCabe. Clearly, there
relating to arrest largely absent. Some changes, as the Minister made clear, are responding to some Supreme Court decisions in the Quirke and Corcoran cases and EU obligations arising from the Landeck judgment. Those precedents have arisen in the years since 2021 and it is right that … either. Why?
I am now getting in to a deeply concerning area in relation to journalistic privilege and privilege in general. Following the Corcoran judgment, the Government is now requiring that An Garda Síochána must make clear to a judge when it anticipates that privileged material will
protected disclosure departments. This legislation in regard to SLAPP is happening at the same time that continued penalisation is happening against Dr. Donal Corcoran and Detective Superintendent Brian O'Reilly. I ask the Minister of State to intervene and cease that because if we believe in protecting whistleblowers
briefed him on that. Be that as it may, the nub of this is simply this. Tonight, the very person, Dr. Donal Corcoran, who was in charge of running the protected disclosures office will tell a story of how he and others experienced and observed consistent undermining
that Donal Corcoran
rights of journalists to protect sources. This is arguably required to bring the law into line with the 2023 decision in Emmett Corcoran v. the Attorney General where the Supreme Court judge, Mr. Justice Gerard Hogan, stated that the general "protection of sources is integral to free press
another programme for Government commitment being delivered by the Minister. The Bill is also a response to recent legal judgments. In Corcoran v. the Commissioner 2023, the Supreme Court upheld the protection of journalistic sources as a cornerstone of a free press and called for urgent legislative action
Opposition were insinuations that this move is a reaction to the new rental rules.
A couple of hours ago, presenter Alan Corcoran on his "Morning Mix" programme on South East Radio played the audio from a doorbell camera video, which I can give to the Tánaiste
thank Deputy Lawlor. I know Alan Corcoran and I will listen back to his programme and the information the Deputy has just put on the record of the House. I am sure the Minister for housing will do so as well. My starting point in this conversation
forever in the pantomime in Dáil Éireann and so on, but he is one of the great pantomime performers. Alan Corcoran on the local radio station in Wexford has spoken volumes about the Deputy's genuine acting ability in theatre, and he has been a great participant
more often and will be more severe. We need to be better prepared.
The Minister for housing made an extraordinary accusation on Alan Corcoran's show on South East Radio this morning when he accused Met Éireann of guarding information and, essentially, withholding flood warning information about this
thank our staff John Campbell, Marc Nolan and Emmett Corcoran for putting this Private Members' business motion together for us, in the Dail today. Simply put, this motion is to strengthen whistleblower protections. It is about enforcement and accountability in public administration. The treatment of whistleblowers in this
well within the tramlines of diplomatic action that we would do that.
I raise with exasperation and desperation the case of Barry Corcoran in my constituency. In 2019 Barry wanted to take part in a deep retrofit pilot programme. He did his due diligence, checked the SEAI register
In parliamentary questions
No matches in questions.
Want to see how often it came up over time? Follow “corcoran” month by month.