Official portrait of Sinéad Gibney

Sinéad Gibney

Portrait: © Houses of the Oireachtas (Oireachtas (Open Data) PSI Licence) · source file

Social Democrats · Dublin Rathdown · serving since 2024-11-29

Official Oireachtas profile

Record timeline

Voting record Contributions PQs asked
Final Draft Revised National Planning Framework: Motion 2025-04-30 · debate record
-----so we have to build the appropriate infrastructure-----
Final Draft Revised National Planning Framework: Motion 2025-04-30 · debate record
-----to meet those needs.
Protecting the Irish Economy Against Increasing Trade Tariffs: Motion [Private Members] 2025-04-09 · debate record
We welcome this motion and thank our colleagues in Aontú for putting it forward. We welcome the opportunity this morning and later today to speak on tariffs. We urged that this time be made available so that we can discuss this crisis. We in the Social Democrats share deep concerns about the impact of these tariffs on Irish jobs, the economy and consumers. These concerns are shared across the glob…
Tariffs: Statements 2025-04-09 · debate record
I welcome the opportunity to make statements on the tariffs that we know are worrying people across the globe, this country and my constituency of Dublin Rathdown. Tá faitíos ar go leor daoine fud fad na tíre. Tá an faitíos sin orthu mar gheall ar a gcuid post, mar gheall ar chostais maireachtála agus mar gheall nach mbeidh na seirbhísí poiblí a theastaíonn uathu ann mar gheall ar cúlú eacnamaíoch…
Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Bill 2025: Second Stage 2025-04-08 · debate record
I welcome the opportunity to speak on today's legislation. I will set out some of they key principles that inform the Social Democrats' policy positions on retirement and pensions. I had the privilege of working in this area a few years ago when I ran a digital literacy programme for older people in a previous job. People use that word "privilege", but I genuinely did find it a privilege to learn…
Pension Provisions 2025-04-03 · debate record
92. Deputy Sinéad Gibney asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, National Development Plan Delivery and Reform if his Department has taken any steps to address issues with the fast accrual (uniformed) single public service pension scheme for uniformed services recruited after 2013; if his Department plans to address these issues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16472/25]
Pension Provisions 2025-04-03 · debate record
The changes to the public service pension scheme in 2013 essentially created, first, an anomaly and, now, something that has crystalised into policy in respect of fast accrual. Has the Department taken any steps to address issues with the fast accrual single public service pension scheme for members of uniformed services recruited after 2013, specifically the lack of a supplementary pension until …
Pension Provisions 2025-04-03 · debate record
I will jump on one phrase the Minister used. I know it has been essentially a policy that Government spokespeople have used. It is that people are "able" to work after the age of 55. I raised this question on the back of a meeting I had with Dublin firefighters and their union representatives last week. They spoke to me about the specific dangers that their vocation introduced into their lives. Th…
Pension Provisions 2025-04-03 · debate record
I appreciate the liability of the State in terms of pension services but the fact that the supplementary pension has not been a feature since 2013 shows that these uniformed services are a casualty of that policy. Besides the moral obligation we have to these workers who have provided crucial services to our society in the course of their careers, I would also speak to the retention issues that t…
Order of Business 2025-04-01 · debate record
Since 2016, there has been an almost 70% increase in the number of aircraft permitted to bring weapons of war through Ireland or on Irish-registered aircraft. A significant number of flights carrying weapons destined for Israel have travelled through Irish airspace without permission. One would have to wonder, given the carte blanche that apparently exists in the relevant Department, why those fli…
Order of Business 2025-04-01 · debate record
They are the facts.
Order of Business 2025-04-01 · debate record
The legislation applies to both-----
Order of Business 2025-04-01 · debate record
The legislation-----
Support for Householders, Businesses and Farmers Affected by Storm Éowyn: Motion [Private Members] 2025-04-01 · debate record
I too welcome this motion. Gabhaim buíochas le Sinn Féin as ucht an rún seo a chur os comhair na Dála. I wish to speak to three main points in my comments. I will discuss the impact that these weather events are having on communities, lives and livelihoods across Ireland, our need to build climate resilience and what we really want from assistance schemes in order that they be reliable and effect…
Leaders' Questions 2025-03-27 · debate record
The Minister did not answer the question.
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
I move: That Dáil Éireann: recognises: — Ireland's long-standing policy of military neutrality, our strong tradition of peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance abroad, and our strong international reputation in diplomacy; — the importance of safeguards and oversight in ensuring Irish military deployments are in line with our policy of military neutrality; — the importance of democratic consu…
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
I will pick up on some of the points made by the Minister of State and his colleague, the Minister of State, Deputy Byrne. The latter set out a very visceral story about his experience in the UN in 2022 where he had a concern because he did not know whether or not there was going to be a veto. I believe this was about Operation Althea. He did not finish the story. There was no veto. He also did no…
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
-----today and last week in the debate on the international security on trade, the Minister of State has said twice that this was in the general election manifesto. It was not. The triple lock is not mentioned in the Fine Gael manifesto. It is mentioned in the Fianna Fáil one but it is mentioned in the context of reform. What the Minister of State is proposing is simply not reform. That is clear.
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
Another issue I have to pick up on in the contribution of the Minister, Deputy Byrne, is that he said there had been no peacekeeping missions approved. There have of course been peacekeeping missions renewed-----
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
-----but this is too convenient for the Minister of State, Deputy Richmond------
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
-----to not mention that this is fully functioning. Will the Minister of State please allow me to finish my points, with all the respect that he talked about for debate? I also want to pick up on the issue that the Minister of State, Deputy Byrne, raised about us not supporting European Union membership, which is the most preposterous statement for him to make. We, of course, as the Social Democr…
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
He has nobody here to debate this issue.
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
He says that he respects debate but-----
Triple Lock Mechanism and Irish Neutrality: Motion [Private Members] 2025-03-26 · debate record
-----there is no debate happening. Moreover, his respect for debate obviously does not extend to the Irish people. All we are asking for is that this crucial part of our neutrality tradition is simply put to the people. I urge this House again to adopt this motion, put it to the people and defend our triple lock.
Statute Law Revision Bill 2024 [Seanad]: Second Stage 2025-03-26 · debate record
I wish to first call out the key role the Law Reform Commission has played in bringing this Bill before us. Its work is not normally or necessarily headline-grabbing but represents a vital and painstaking role in keeping our law under review and researching law with a view to reform. Our Statute Book should be reflective of the laws that govern us and free of historical instruments that simply no…
← Previous Next →