Micheál Martin
Portrait: © Houses of the Oireachtas (Oireachtas (Open Data) PSI Licence) · source file
Fianna Fáil · Cork South-Central · serving since 2024-11-29
- Vote recorded in 178 of 401 divisions in the archive
- 6,126 debate contributions
- 0 parliamentary questions asked
Record timeline
- constituency Cork South-Central 2024-11-29 to present
- party Fianna Fáil 2024-11-29 to present
- office Taoiseach 2025-01-23 to present
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
The bottom line is if you are an existing tenant there will be no change.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
It is as simple as that. There will be no change if you are an existing tenant, okay.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
There is no reset at six years for an existing tenant. However, if-----
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
New tenancies, new builds and new apartments that will come on stream, hopefully, because this is about supply. With the greatest respect in the world, if we had adopted half of what Deputy Murphy proposed we would have no supply at all in the market. That is the fundamental difference. We need more apartments, we need more houses and we need more in the rental market. In many instances, when the…
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
When RPZs came in first, many people did not increase their rents. Quite a number did not. To keep momentum in the market and to keep people in the market, that is a balanced response to the current situation. We want to bring more investment in to build-----
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
It is capped at 2%. The second cap is CPI. Basically, there is a cap of whatever the inflation rate is. The inflation rate is forecast to be 2%, on average, for the next number of years. It is also the focus of the ECB to keep inflation at 2%.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
If we do not tie it to CPI and freeze it as the Deputy is saying, why would anyone invest in any new apartment block? Why would anyone build a new house or a new apartment for rent if effectively they would begin to lose money within a couple of years? No one is going to make an investment decision on the basis, as the Deputy is proposing, that we have a rent freeze for three years or longer. No o…
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
We are extending it, making it national and giving stronger protections than tenants had before this package, which will be legislated for, was announced.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
That is what I said.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
You deliberately-----
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
It is interesting that in the exchange the Deputy acknowledged that it is new tenancies.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
I have been saying since I came in that existing tenants would not have their rents increased beyond 2% as per the RPZ.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
The Deputies are interrupting because they do not like the facts. The bottom line in respect of new tenancies is yes, in respect of tenancies where the tenant has left so the tenant does not get exorbitant increases. The balance here is that we need more investment into the market. I know the Deputy does not really believe in that.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
The Deputy believes it should be the State in its entirety. That is a fundamental difference. I argue that if we were to take the Deputy's policies, we would have no new supply at all. That is a fundamental difference. I acknowledge that. The Deputy does not believe in a market-based economy. That is his position.
Leaders' Questions
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
I happen to believe in a balanced economic framework where you have public sector investment, and we have unprecedented levels of State investment. However, you will need private sector investment to get the level of investment we require. I do not think the State can sustainably spend €20 billion per annum on housing alone. That will not suffice. I do not think the people want that sort of approa…
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
These figures are serious and of concern but they are from 2023, the year the data was collected. The Government had not yet, at that stage, brought in free school meals for all primary school students or free schoolbooks at second level. I am sure the Deputy would acknowledge these measures have had a significant impact on many families and are making a real difference to children in poverty, but…
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
At the weekend, I was in Nice for the United Nations Ocean Conference and took the opportunity to meet with a number of people in respect of this issue. The crew of the Madleen deserve our recognition. I pay tribute to their bravery and courage for profiling and keeping in the public and international spotlight the shocking situation in Gaza and the deprivation and starvation there. It brings to m…
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
I hope we can leverage significant international support for pressure to be put on Israel.
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
Then there will be the EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting after that and then an European Council meeting-----
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
The reference to complicity in genocide is shocking and wrong. I genuinely mean that.
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
I do not in any way underestimate the Deputy’s sincerity on this issue. I respect it. She has been very consistent on this, but it is wrong to say others in this House are complicit in genocide when they most certainly are not.
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
It is a phrase that is thrown around too cheaply, and violence and criminal acts can emanate from that. Certain people are already engaging in criminal damage of TDs' offices and the Department of foreign affairs because of that handy phrase used to label everybody as complicit in genocide. Ireland is doing everything it possibly can on the key platforms for us to try to put pressure on Israel. Wh…
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
The legislation last week would have done nothing to change that.
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
The Central Bank may be in a position over time to do something.
Order of Business
2025-06-10 ·
debate record
There may be a route there, but that in itself is not going to change what is happening now.