At its Ard-Fheis this weekend, Fine Gael will launch its blueprint for Irish unity. It is a welcome and positive initiative and I look forward to reading its proposals. The Taoiseach has announced that a new body to examine reunification will be established. This is a time of real optimism. The momentum for Irish unity is building, so this is a moment for leadership. The preparations for constitutional change must start now. The Government must play a leading role. The conversation must be deepened and expanded to allow all people across the island to come together and chart the future. Our ambition is a new, united Ireland founded on equality, democracy, respect and reconciliation. Does the Minister agree this generation has an historic opportunity to shape the future and that this is a moment that must be grasped with energy and enthusiasm?
Thursday 5 November 2026
Questions on Policy or Legislation
54 contributions, as the Official Report records them.
Jennifer Carroll MacNeill
Fine Gael recorded as Minister for Health (Deputy Jennifer Carroll MacNeill) As a minister Link to thisI thank the Deputy for raising this matter. I was a member of the Good Friday Agreement committee with many of his colleagues in Sinn Féin. This is a really important area for all of us. What Fine Gael and all parties want is to provide a structure and a plan for the future, whatever that future may be. We have dealt with so many disruptions and opportunities. It is intelligent and appropriate that we take the correct pace to looking at constitutional and integration issues and doing that with the utmost respect for every perspective on this island, both North and South.
Fine Gael is the united Ireland party. That is what the party has always been. It has always played a constructive role in that and again wants to play a strategic, constructive role in planning for the broad future, respecting every voice and perspective on this island.
There will be chaos in Dublin next week when EU Heads of State visit. We are told to expect complete gridlock from Tuesday as roads are closed. Public transport routes will also be significantly impacted. The National Transport Authority is saying every mode of transport, cycling, walking, driving, train and bus, will be affected. There is simply no way to avoid this. Why is the Government not intervening and asking employers to allow their staff, where possible, to work from home next week? Some people will need to get to work or to attend appointments in the city and more may be on strike next Thursday, but many employees will be forced to make a journey into town when they could easily be doing the same job from home. That makes absolutely no sense, particularly when we are being warned of commuter carnage because of these EU Presidency events.
The huge increase in the number of employers diluting their workers' entitlement to work from home in recent years has been disastrous for employees and their quality of life and has added to gridlock all over the country, which costs the State nearly €500 million per year. Instead of employees being stuck in traffic for hours on end next week, will the Minister appeal to employers to ask staff, where possible, to work from home?
I appreciate the question. It is important to recognise that this Government created the opportunity to have the right to work at home. It is a day that is very unusual and a day in which Ireland can take great pride. We have not done this since 2013 and will not do it again until 2040 or 2041. It is a day when Ireland is the centre of Europe and when the Council and the European Political Community meet here, as opposed to somewhere else. That is an important day for the State. It is one day.
It is all three days next week.
I am sure employers can provide the flexibility they need for their employees across the country.
Will the Minister appeal to them?
I appeal to the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Deputy Heydon, to engage in proper, meaningful discussions regarding live animal export. Every year, animals are transported within and without the EU, enduring long, exhausting journeys in inadequate conditions. We hear reports of pregnant heifers, unweaned calves and other vulnerable animals being subjected to stress, suffering and long journey times. The new animal welfare strategy released this week is welcome, but strategies and promises are not enough. We need legislation that delivers real, measurable improvements in animal welfare. I ask the Minister to engage with stakeholders, farmers, people working in the sector and animal rights organisations to look at better enforcement and to debate whether we need live exports in this day and age. We cannot continue to overlook the realities of what is, at times, a barbarous process. The Department repeatedly refers in parliamentary questions to Ireland's role as an honest broker but we have not outlined our negotiating position on journey times, space allowances or temperature restrictions. We need to have an open discussion on this.
The Minister, Deputy Heydon, brought the animal welfare proposals to Cabinet this week, and they are grounded in looking after the welfare of every animal. The Minister engages enthusiastically with all stakeholders in the agriculture sector.
I will bring the Deputy's question to his attention because I cannot answer it any further than that.
It is now becoming clear that half of Dublin city is going to be locked down. I would like to know the cost of next Thursday to facilitate these EU leaders. There will be huge expense, huge chaos and difficulty for workers to get to work and so on to facilitate these EU leaders, who are probably coming here to tell us why we need to double arms expenditure across Europe. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of public sector workers are being forced out on strike on the same day because the Government will not pay them properly. Does this demonstrate the Government's priorities - facilitating EU leaders who want to talk about increasing arms expenditure ahead of looking after working people in this country who are being forced out to strike on the same day the Government is wining and dining European leaders?
I am not sure what the Deputy is suggesting. Is he suggesting that we do not host EU leaders during the Irish European Presidency? Is he suggesting that we go against the wishes of the 88% of Irish people who are enthusiastic supporters of Europe - the highest across the EU? Is he suggesting that we do not discharge our obligations as a sovereign State in hosting leaders of governments right across Europe who want to be here-----
Do not disrupt public transport.
-----and want to engage in a stable conversation about the future of Europe?
Do not cause chaos for them, and pay the workers.
I thank the Minister.
It is entirely possible-----
Pay the workers.
We are a pragmatic, agile and intelligent State. If people can work from home, that is fantastic even if others cannot, but we are the Irish State and the centre of Europe at the moment with the Presidency. If the Deputy is suggesting that we should not discharge our sovereign obligations in that way, then I suggest that he take that conversation to the people of Dún Laoghaire-----
Why does the city have to shut down?
------because I know what their view is.
I will be taking it to the protest on the day.
They do not want tourism either.
In the recent budget, the Government announced what I publicly acknowledged as a game-changer for many throughout the country, this being a €9,000 solar grant that can lead to homes getting up to nine panels and a battery free of charge if they receive certain payments, such as the fuel allowance, the working family payment, the disability allowance, the domiciliary care allowance, the one-parent family paymnet, the carer's allowance and certain jobseeker's allowances. However, the devil is in the detail. We have now found out that anyone in these categories living in a council house or a community-run housing association cannot get this grant. This is similar to the targeted agriculture modernisation scheme, TAMS, grant, which is desperately needed by farmers, promising up to 60% in solar grants. When the farmer applies, they are refused for one reason or another.
Can changes be made to this solar grant roll-out to include local authorities and community-run housing bodies for those who meet the criteria, which will help homeowners but also could help local authorities, which could benefit financially from any extra power savings to be made and which could give them much-needed funds? More importantly, it would help those who do not qualify under these criteria at the moment if they live in a council house. Many of them are in energy arrears and are living in the cold in their homes at this time.
On the specifics of the solar panel grants, I will raise that with the Minister, Deputy O'Brien. It is important. The Deputy will remember that this Government has tried to prioritise local authority and social housing in providing retrofitting and wraparound heating to be able to insulate those homes first, recognising that those households may not have the funds to do that. Of course, the funding from that comes from carbon tax revenues, which are extremely important. We will continue carbon tax to ensure that we have that dedicated, ring-fenced funding to do precisely what the Deputy is suggesting. As to the specifics of the grant, I will raise that with the Minister.
I rise to raise the programme for Government commitment to introduce a new management plan for the Curragh Plains. Will the Minister bring this matter to the attention of the Tánaiste, who has been particularly helpful on this matter, and to the attention of the Minister, Deputy McEntee? From watching the debate around this in the two years or so since the Government has been formed, it is clear the Government is moving towards a position of recommending that the National Parks and Wildlife Service take responsibility for the Curragh Plains. This is a superb organisation that has done wonderful work with our parks and flora and fauna. It is a pioneering organisation. However, it is manifestly the wrong organisation to take responsibility for the Curragh Plains. The Curragh Plains has far more in common with Phoenix Park, where there is a multiplicity of intensive uses well established. I have never heard any criticism of how the Office of Public Works, OPW, manages Phoenix Park. It has proven its ability to do what needs to be done in Kildare. I implore the Ministers and the Government to move away from the National Parks and Wildlife Service to the OPW and to designate it as the management body.
I will bring that to the Tánaiste and the Minister, Deputy McEntee, for their attention. The Deputy makes an excellent point. I apologise that I cannot answer it any further than that, but I will bring it to their attention.
On Tuesday last, my Oireachtas colleagues from south Tipperary and I met with the CEO of Irish Water owing to the level of crisis across my constituency. Tens of thousands are on a boil water notice. Some of those have been on a boil water notice since February of this year. For a time, they were on a "do not consume" notice. There have been multiple outages and poor communication. This is a public utility, in receipt of significant funds, offering an essential service, yet not accountable to Dáil Éireann. I cannot table a parliamentary question, nor can I question the CEO by means of a select committee. That needs to change. I think every Member in this House believes that Irish Water should be more accountable to this House. How do we make this happen?
Hear, hear.
I acknowledge the Deputy's continued advocacy in respect of this water difficulty with the Ardfinnan regional water supply scheme. I acknowledge that the boil notice is still there, which is deeply disruptive for the Deputy's constituents and the people of the area. Uisce Éireann has acknowledged that its engagement with public representatives needs to improve. There is no question about that and I entirely agree with the Deputy. It is a body that receives significant public funding. The way in which it has been set up as a statutorily independent body has separated it from the usual parliamentary question schemes that we all know. However, the Deputy is right in the sense that we need a better structure within which it can reply to Members of the Oireachtas, who vote on the expenditure that it gets. That is not particular to Uisce Éireann and it applies to the generality of State bodies, but this is one that so deeply and directly affects constituents. I very clearly hear what the Deputy is saying.
The use of scramblers and electric bikes has long been a scourge in our communities and is only getting worse due to the lack of implementation of regulations. Rank-and-file gardaí tell me there is a resistance to tackle scramblers without sufficient training and adequate protections. I asked Commissioner Justin Kelly two weeks ago at the public accounts committee if the ongoing Garda pursuit training would extend beyond cars to scramblers. He said he did not know and could not provide the detail. I followed up with a parliamentary question seeking clarity and the Minister for justice has just washed his hands of it. How can we implement the likes of Grace's law if the Garda is not resourced to pursue scramblers? How are we at the point where neither the Commissioner nor the Minister for justice knows whether the training being rolled out is even sufficient in that regard?
It is an incredibly important area. I thank the Deputy for raising it. In the first half of 2026 alone, there were 180 scrambler seizures, which was well ahead of the 2025 figure of 159. In addition, Garda authorities report 1,412 incidents in which an e-scooter was seized in the first half of the year. Again, that is up on the 2025 figure.
Specific to the Deputy's questions about the Garda pursuit training, she is aware that the Garda Commissioner has confirmed that will happen. Her particular point relates to whether that will extend to scramblers. I cannot answer that here. I do not know the answer to that, but I will highlight to the Minister, Deputy O'Callaghan, that the Deputy has asked that question and ask that that Department come back to the Deputy more directly when that is clear.
There have been few or no prosecutions or persons charged with criminal damage to Dublin City Council-owned properties running into hundreds of thousands of euro on an annual basis. For example, vacant houses are being severely damaged by being broken into or graffitied, often with racist language. Newly built playgrounds are being maliciously damaged and often set on fire. All of this amounts to a huge cost to the council as well as the community. There needs to be a proper response along with an active plan from both the Garda and Dublin City Council in identifying those responsible and bringing them to court as this is an ongoing criminal activity with no end in sight. Communities are at their wits' end. Will the Minister ensure this criminal activity is treated with the seriousness it deserves?
Getting more gardaí on the streets, particularly in Dublin city centre, is the Government's first priority in the area of justice. A new intake of 200 trainee gardaí have entered Templemore this week. From that attestation, and this the reason I mention it, 84 will be deployed to the Dublin metropolitan region. There has been a significant increase there. The Deputy is quite right, however, that the combination of local authority work plus policing is what is necessary. In part, that is where the Dublin city task force and the work being led by Robert Watt is so very important.
Criminal damage is criminal damage. While neither the Deputy nor I can prosecute that in this House, we want there to be prosecutions for damage to State and community entities, including playgrounds and local authority housing. The Deputy is quite right to highlight the need for that and I thank him.
We would collectively agree that the waiting times for speech and language therapy across the system are appalling. In Dublin South-West, 1,100 children are waiting on therapies, and the list only gets longer. The latest figure I received for Chamber House in Tallaght for August indicate an average waiting time of 119 months – ten long years. How is it acceptable for a toddler to be identified as needing support and not getting it until they are in secondary school? Is it not time for the Government to accept that its approach has failed and it is time to adopt a different one? What is the Government going to do to bring down the waiting times for speech and language therapy in Tallaght and elsewhere in the State? When will families and children see results?
The Deputy is quite right; it is not acceptable. As his colleague, Deputy Doherty, highlighted, children cannot be left because the impact of a wait of six months, never mind a year or two years-----
I am talking about ten years.
-----is so much more impactful at tender ages such as, in the case he raised, a toddler aged three. Our real challenge is that while we have invested in the system and there are many more people working in it, we are not getting the collective benefit of that for our children. There has to be reform of the way in which services are assessed and delivered. I ask all Deputies to work with us on how we reorganise and reallocate those resources to make sure that children are getting therapies as opposed to document after document and children suffering due to the disorganisation of systems. While we have tried to reorganise the systems into a single point of access, there is much more to do to make sure that every therapist trained in the State is doing therapy are not administration. In part, that is what we need to do to make sure that the additional resource benefits our children.
When Fine Gael entered Government in 2011, the average house price was €195,000 and the average rent was €765. The average price house price is now €390,000, while the average new rent is over €2000. Rents and house prices have more than doubled during Fine Gael's time in office. Last week, a young couple aged in their 20s from east Galway contacted me and said that despite both of them working the prospect of finding affordable accommodation is extremely poor and from what they have seen they could easily end up spending over 50% of their combined income on rent, assuming they are fortunate enough to find somewhere suitable. They went on to say that they found it difficult to understand how two young working adults are expected to build an independent life under these circumstances. What does the Minister have to say to that couple? This is not an accident; it is the result of deliberate political choices. Why has the Government prioritised vulture funds and big landlords over young workers and families? What will it take for the Government to admit it is making the crisis worse? We need genuinely affordable housing, a ban on rent increases and real support for renters. Young people need hope and an opportunity to build a life in Ireland.
I thank the Deputy. Indeed they do. One of the many parts of that is what Fine Gael has done in government. Prior to it coming into government, house prices were much higher. The Deputy will recall the crash that resulted in many people being left in negative equity and without a job and interest rates that led the State to a position whereby it could not borrow on the international markets. Fine Gael in government has gotten us back to having a better borrowing position than the UK and most of Europe because of the way in which we managed the economy. Young people have jobs. The Deputy is correct. House prices and rents have increased and we have invested into directly building and subsidising housing in many different ways. Most important has been the Land Development Agency, established 2018 by a Fine Gael Government to drive social and affordable housing. I am glad to see the fruits of that. We want to see so much more.
The people of Connemara have waited years for an ambulance base. Unfortunately, since the project was approved there have been numerous delays. We are now told that the building will be completed by December this year and operational from January. That is good news. I want a commitment from the Minister that this will be the case and there will not be further delays. This is important for the people of Connemara. Tá muintir Chonamara ag fanacht le fada an lá - ar feadh na blianta - i gcomhair bunáit don otharcharr agus beidh sé sin sa tSraith Salach. Ó thaobh an tionscnamh beartaithe, bhí moill curtha air arís agus arís eile. Tá sé ráite ag an HSE go mbeidh sé críochnaithe i mí na Nollag agus go gcuirfear i bhfeidhm é i mí Eanáir seo chugainn, rud atá go maith agus caithfimid fáilte a chur roimhe, ach an féidir leis an Aire a dheimhniú nach mbeidh tuilleadh moill air agus go mbeidh sé ar fáil do mhuintir Chonamara i mí Eanáir?
The Deputy is correct; construction will be completed. The development of the service plan prioritises the ambulance service for more rural areas to ensure that we are reaching people more quickly. I will always be careful about a commitment. I would rather say the day that it starts instead of two months out. Clearly, the building is in a process of completion. That is our general priority in terms of the distribution of the additional ambulance resources that we have secured for next year.
The cyberattack on a major supermarket this week is a stark reminder of the threat of cybercrime to businesses. I am also aware of an Irish food producer which has had its operations targeted and a ransom in the region of €400,000 demanded. What more can the Government do to address the very real threat that cybercrime poses, not only to the operations but success of businesses in Ireland, many of which are large employers and, in particular, SMEs?
I thank the Deputy. It is a very serious risk for businesses. One of the worries I have is that there is so much more happening than we are being told, and ransomware is a problem but the State is not necessarily aware of its scale. Supports are available. In particular, Enterprise Ireland, in partnership with the National Cyber Security Centre, offers a cyber security review grant which enables SMEs, in particular, to access cyber security experts to assess vulnerabilities and develop a roadmap to direct strengthening their cyber resilience. That grant covers 80% of the cost of a cyber security review up to a project value of €3,000. Like every other part of Europe, we are vulnerable to these type of attacks, whether it is the State or individual businesses. That kind of vigilance is incredibly important.
The CEO of CUH, Ms Jennifer Kearney, raised issues of concern regarding positions that were vacant and there was talk of a performance review of her. She is a formidable lady and somebody who is good at her job. I recently attended a meeting in UHL regarding mid-west health issues. We are facing into crisis over the next couple of months. At the meeting, concern was raised in respect of recruitment issues, governance and clinical decision-making because of the situation the hospital has been left in. There was concern about how it was speaking publicly. I am worried about this trend. My colleague, Deputy Sherlock, wrote to the Minister recently regarding a circular sent by the Department, namely, the Department of Health recruitment and promotion financial sanction process communication dated 13 October 2026. It covered a range of issues, including recruitment and pay. This changes the relationship between the Department of Health, Minister and HSE. Under what legal basis is the Minister operating? Under what legal basis are these memos being sent out? Trust me, I am very familiar with the Act. What section of the Act gives the Minister or her Department the authority to issue such correspondence?
I thank the Deputy. I do not necessarily accept the point he made in respect of a trend. The HSE and Department of Health were very much together to try to deliver services for people across this country. There has been an increase in the budget this year and last year. My response is always factual and about the numbers, because that is the truth. That is what transparency.
What legal basis?
The Deputy's colleague highlighted that. Forgive me; I do not have the section in front of me. I understand the Secretary General has written to the Deputy's colleague regarding the issue she raised. Essentially, the Department of public expenditure has given us a revised sanction as a consequence of the budget overrun this year, which is partly concerns pay, which is within our control, and non-pay, which largely involves drugs and the primary care reimbursement service, PCRS, which is not necessarily within our control because it is a demand-led service. As a result of a revised sanction, we therefore have to reset the parameters and work with the HSE to try to bring those areas that we can control as close to budget as possible. We are in a situation of competing demand. On the one hand, we need to maintain budgetary discipline in the areas we can control. On the other, we are trying to deliver services. In between is the reality and truth of how many people we have hired and how much more we want to do next year.
However, we have a responsibility to the Oireachtas to stay within the budget and parameters it has given.
The children's disability network teams are where some of the most vulnerable and needy disabled and neurodivergent children languish, and where they are meant to be cared for in our country. I want to tell the Minister the figures for Dublin 15 that I received from her Department in response to a recent parliamentary question, and she might tell me if she thinks it is acceptable. In Blakestown CDNT, people can wait 58 months to be assessed. In Blanchardstown, that figure is 50 months, and in Cabra and Grangegorman, it is 48 months. How is this in any way acceptable? In my view, it is absolutely criminal that children can nearly age out before they are assessed. It points to the need for a third CDNT team in Dublin 15, which has been a demand of parents and it is a demand of the special task force that was set up there. Will the Minister commit to setting that up or does she think it is fine or acceptable that children in Blanchardstown, Mulhuddart, Ongar, Blakestown or wherever should wait three of four times longer than those in other areas, which is obviously already totally unacceptable? We cannot accept that this is the way disabled and neurodivergent children are treated.
No, I do not think it is acceptable, to be very clear. I do not think it is acceptable at all, and I have similar challenges as a constituency TD and always have. Deputy Coppinger is correct to highlight it.
The challenge is that we have 461 additional student places over the next two years, so we are recruiting more therapists. We have increased the workforce by 31%. In 2025, €2.85 million of funding was provided in various positions across CDNTs. An additional €8 million was secured in budget 2026 to allow the funding of 150 posts to CDNTs, and in the year to date, 80 of those have been filled, with the remainder in recruitment, yet we are still not meeting that need. I urge and ask for support as we reorganise the considerable additional resources we have put into CDNTs, into special education and into the harmony between them. I ask for support with the reform and reallocation of how those services are delivered to try to make sure that every therapist we have trained and are recruiting is delivering therapy services instead of being stuck in bureaucracy.
I wish to raise the increasingly challenging financial situation that local authorities find themselves in. Rising inflation has driven up the cost of fuel, energy, payroll and pensions, while responsibilities and demands on local authorities continue to increase. This is particularly challenging for rural local authorities, like Tipperary for example, where we have an extensive roads network but a small rates base. This is particularly due to a lack of foreign direct investment bringing industry into counties like ours, unlike urban authorities that have a greater rates base.
Three major demands are being raised with me as a representative in Tipperary, which our county councillors across the country are also talking about. One is the full restoration of the central management charge for water staff, which is a really challenging financial issue now facing rural local authorities. The second is a dedicated, adequately funded, multi-annual programme for the shared costs of concentric cabling, which is estimated at €700 million across all local authorities for 75,000 public lights. The third is a meaningful increase in the budget from the Department of Transport for our regional and local roads. Without those, our local authorities are looking at having to increase taxes and charges locally without improving services.
The funding of our local authorities is so important, through both our rates base and all the other funding streams, including central government. I am aware of this issue. My colleague Deputy Michael Murphy raised it with us yesterday at the parliamentary party meeting. I am aware of it and I will highlight it to the Tánaiste, who is also aware of it. We discussed it yesterday. I will also raise it with the Minister, Deputy Browne.
It is time for us to crack down on the pop-up vape shops that are becoming blights on our streets in towns and villages around the country. We all know them. They have neon signs. They purport to sell sweets and are always largely empty. I want to compliment the Minister's work and the work of the Minister of State, Deputy Murnane O'Connor, on regulating vapes, but now is the time for us to consider a particular planning class for vape shops, similar to that which exists for off-licences, to ensure the proliferation we are seeing in areas like Clondalkin in my constituency is not repeated and maintained across the country. As well as that, it is time to resource the HSE to undertake a mystery shopper experience to make sure that vapes are not being sold to under-18s and that dangerous products are not being sold to the public under the guise of these vapes shops. We must also ensure An Garda Síochána is aware of that effort and works in tandem with the Revenue Commissioners to make sure that these businesses are not fronts for something else and that vapes, which were designed as a nicotine replacement product, do not become a recreational drug of choice for so many of our young people across the country. I ask for the Minister's support in addressing those various aspects of this problem.
I acknowledge Deputy Moynihan's repeated advocacy on this point. I also compliment the Minister of State, Deputy Murnane O'Connor, on her work in bringing through the legislation to prohibit the disgusting colours, flavours and whatnot to try to get children addicted to nicotine products. I assure the Deputy the Department of Health would enthusiastically participate in any initiative to reduce the number of vape shops being given planning and the proliferation of them in towns. It is bad for people's health and it is also bad for towns to see these repeated shops. I will certainly instruct my officials to engage in that, but it is a matter for the Department of planning and I will discuss it with the Minister, Deputy Browne. Deputy Moynihan can be assured the Department of Health would be enthusiastic supporters of anything to prevent the proliferation of vape shops.
I welcome the recent announcement by the Minister for Finance in relation to Home Building Finance Ireland, HBFI, expanding its lending powers, but the prices it charges for lending are still way too high. This morning, for apartments, HBFI loans carry margins of 4.75% to 7.5% over what is called the Euribor. Those are rates of 7% to 10% plus. That is too high a cost of money for small developers. Small builders will tell you they have to recover all of those costs either from renters or from those who buy the houses. That is Government money; the rates are way too high. HBFI is also charging arrangement fees, such as 1% entry and exit fees. This is a State agency. It should not be charging arrangement fees. It should be lending money at really competitive rates, supported and backed by the State, so those small builders can get on with it and build those houses. What can we do to get HBFI lending at a good rate?
I agree with Deputy Ó Muirí. The cost of finance can be the difference between a viable housing project going ahead or sitting on the shelf, and that is particularly true for smaller builders, which is what HBFI is there to support. Cabinet has now approved the drafting of legislation to allow Home Building Finance Ireland to finance the purchase of land already zoned for housing before planning permission is in place. The Tánaiste brought that to Cabinet this week and it is an important advancement because it helps smaller builders to secure their next site without having to tie up so much of their money upfront. That is it. We are trying to reduce costs for smaller builders and make sure they have access to finance in building homes. The terms have to work in practice and the aim is that HBFI offers genuinely competitive terms and rates for the risk involved on the full cost to the builder, including any interest rate and fees.
← Back to the rest of Thursday 5 November
Debate record: official record, fetched 5 Nov 2026
SHA-256 e148e59b5142…
Provenance
View raw