2026-04-23

219. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the current status of the draft legislation to amend the Technological Universities Act 2018 to facilitate a partnership between Dundalk Institute of Technology and Queen’s University Belfast; the timeline for when a draft Bill will be presented; if IADT is the only other remaining institute of technology, being actively considered within the scope of any proposed legislative amendments to the Act; if any proposed amendments will also provide a pathway for IADT to achieve university designation within the technological university sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29169/26]

What is the current status of the draft legislation to amend the Technological Universities Act in terms of the facilitation of the partnership that was announced between Dundalk Institute of Technology and Queen's University Belfast? I ask that question in particular because of the potential implications for what will be then the last remaining institute of technology, IT, which is the Institute of Art, Design and Technology, IADT, and whether there is scope within the legislation for its status to be dealt with.

First of all, to take the Dundalk Institute of Technology and Queen's University Belfast partnership, that partnership under development is a hugely significant initiative, as I am sure the Deputy will agree, and advances the Government's goal, not only of balanced regional development, although it very much does in creating a university now on that north-east corridor between Dublin and Belfast, but by creating the first ever all-island university it very much advances the shared island objectives and broader objectives of alignment between both jurisdictions on the island and creating that shared entity. That partnership will include the development of shared processes in awarding qualifications, managing quality assurance of these different assessment bodies and grades, etc., within it, and collaboration in the research and innovation space. It is also worth noting that Dundalk, under the partnership and under the technical specifications we are devising in terms of how it will operate, will retain its status as an autonomous designated institution of higher education in the State. While being part of Queen's, it also remains an autonomous entity within the State. The matter has progressed steadily. I first brought it to Government in November. I was delighted to be able to do so. I secured Cabinet approval and set out immediately on pursuing the legislation that would be required to give effect to it. The colleges themselves, Queen's and DkIT, have been engaging closely and setting up working groups along with officials from my Department to prepare the necessary requirements and regulations to align the two jurisdictions and address whatever wrinkles may be there between incompatibilities to bring those together. I am conscious of the Deputy's interest in IADT, which I share. I have visited the college on a number of occasions. I have met the IADT executive, president and team, both on site and, indeed, in here and in other areas. The IADT is one of only two remaining ITs in the State. It is a distinctive institution. It is a great opportunity for it, as a leader in the creative arts. I will come back to that in my next contribution.

I can see the attraction of university status for Dundalk as an all-island university, etc., but that leaves Dún Laoghaire IADT out on its own with no clear pathway forward. In particular, I am concerned for the staff and the workers, their terms and conditions and the sustainability of the IADT. If everybody who used to be in an IT is now in a university, who wants to go to IADT, but if IADT is to get university status, is it to be done under the Technological Universities Act 2018 so that the staff retain their existing terms and conditions? That is the way the staff would like it to be done. That is their clear declared position, and they are quite angry. The Teachers' Union of Ireland, TUI, deplored the way in which the announcement was made, that it had not been consulted with in advance, that the authorities of Queen's and Dundalk and the Government clearly involved in the discussions around this make an announcement but that there was no consultation with the TUI and with the workers. This needs to be addressed.

Taking the Deputy's questions in reverse order, I will deal with the TUI in the first instance. The manner of the announcement was sensitive and was a case of jumping together. The executive of Dundalk IT, the board of Queen's University and, indeed, Cabinet here considered the matter on the same morning at the same time, and having come to a shared conclusion, we were then in a position to announce. I hope the Deputy will understand due to the sensitivities around it. It is historic. It is groundbreaking as a development creating the first all-island university, and it was essential that we moved as one. I hope that puts some context on the announcement. I have met the TUI executive on a number of occasions, both here in Leinster House and elsewhere. I attended their conference recently and engaged with them on this matter and many other matters. We had a good, solid engagement. I do not say they agree with me on everything, nor I with them on everything, but we have a good working relationship and there is mutual respect there. I might come back to the IADT-specific position in the next round because I want to go into some detail on that.

First, it is not great to make an announcement like that without consulting the workers. Their clearly declared position is that it should be done through an amendment to the Technological Universities Act 2018. Will the Minister clarify that is what the draft legislation is, when we are going to see it, when it will be published and whether there will be scope for amendment to accommodate a pathway to university status for IADT, which will be the last remaining IT? IADT will not be sustainable unless it has a pathway to university status, but the one that is preferred by the TUI and the staff in IADT is for it to be done through a technological universities Bill because anything else threatens or creates considerable uncertainty for the future of those workers and the terms and conditions of employment they enjoy.

The Technological Universities, TU, Act is predicated on the creation of technological universities through the amalgamation of institutes of technology and by ITs coming together to form a technological university. That is the framework that is provided for in the current TU Act. The Act does not currently have a mechanism for the elevation of a single IT to become a university. That process is not catered for within the Act. The Act is for an amalgamation and coming together of different satellites to become one. It does not have a single elevation path. In the case of Dundalk and Queen's, there are a number of unique aspects to the partnership, because of the North-South and cross-jurisdictional nature of it. That requires separate legislation. I intend to publish heads of Bill at the earliest opportunity, which will be very soon and perhaps as early as next week, and we will see the flow forward from it at that stage. I share the ambition of IADT to achieve university status. I fully support it in doing that. I respect the rights of staff and, indeed, learners at the college to have their say in that process. That is the process I am also engaging in, working with the institute in parallel.